Schools have the right to restrict students’ actions

This week, The Eagle’s opinion writers are taking on the suspension of several New York high school students who were suspended for “Tebowing” in their school’s hallways (see Page 6). Since this imitation of the football star’s sideline prayer falls neatly into the category of self-expression, The Eagle’s editorial board felt it prudent to discuss the legal realities of free speech for students in public schools.

The most important Supreme Court decision affecting student free speech is Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District.

In December 1965, a trio of Des Moines students attended school wearing black arm bands in protest of the Vietnam War. After being suspended, the students filed a suit that was carried to the Supreme Court.

The court ruled in favor of the students, contending that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

The decision established that students enjoy the right to free speech during school, so long as the speech does not cause a distraction to the learning environment. Other Supreme Court decisions, though, have tempered this right. Specifically, Bethel School District v. Fraser.

In April 1983, a Washington high school student named Matthew Fraser was suspended for delivering a speech to the student body that made extensive use of sexual innuendo. Fraser’s suit against the school reached the Supreme Court three years later, where a 7-2 ruling upheld Fraser’s suspension and established an important limitation on student free speech: that schools may restrict speech that conflicts with their basic education mission.

A bevy of other court decisions have refined and limited free speech in schools, but students in public schools still enjoy substantial freedom of expression. This fact is often overlooked by students, their parents, and administrators.

The Eagle’s editorial board urges that citizens, to more accurately and appropriately assess situations such as the “Tebowing” suspensions, learn and understand the legal specifics of student free speech and its many protections and limitations.

Comments

Comments are closed.

Recent Editorial Articles

Join CSC’s wild jungle party

Oct. 1, 2014

Homecoming: a time of the year when everyone on-campus can use their creative minds and have some fun.


League reprimands lack consistency

Sep. 24, 2014

With controversy hovering around the NFL executives and players, the topic of domestic abuse has come to the forefront of the picture in the past few months.


Register to vote before it’s too late

Sep. 17, 2014

Election Day in the United States is the Tuesday following the first Monday in November. This year, that day is Nov. 4, which is less than 50 days from today.


Handle the ISIS threat with caution

Sep. 10, 2014

Most CSC students weren’t even in high school when the U.S. military invaded Iraq in 2003. It’s likely then that few of us remember the rhetoric that drove us into the nearly nine-year conflict.


Suicides are over-publicized

Aug. 27, 2014

Death is a sensitive subject, one that few of us feel comfortable openly discussing. However, when a celebrity dies, their death is plastered on every cable news channel and social media site for weeks thereafter.